
\begin{table}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{External Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Satisfaction with Democracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Internal Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Political Interest} \\
\midrule
Group 2                 & -0.14^{*}  & -0.20^{***} & 0.08        & 0.08       \\
                        & (0.08)     & (0.07)      & (0.10)      & (0.08)     \\
Wave 3                  & -0.20^{**} & -0.17^{**}  & -0.27^{***} & -0.17^{**} \\
                        & (0.08)     & (0.07)      & (0.10)      & (0.08)     \\
Group 2 $\times$ Wave 3 & 0.03       & 0.14        & 0.11        & -0.00      \\
                        & (0.12)     & (0.11)      & (0.15)      & (0.12)     \\
(Intercept)             & 3.05^{***} & 3.79^{***}  & 3.40^{***}  & 3.50^{***} \\
                        & (0.06)     & (0.05)      & (0.07)      & (0.06)     \\
\midrule
R$^2$                   & 0.01       & 0.01        & 0.01        & 0.01       \\
N                       & 1084       & 1092        & 1085        & 1094       \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{l}{\tiny{\footnotesize $^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\end{small}
\caption{The effect of regaining eligibility. Presented estimates capture the results from DiD-specifications comparing groups 1 and 2 across waves2 and 3. Based on a birthdates sample with bandwidth 250.}
\label{table:coefficients}
\end{center}
\end{table}
